<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>VMware Communities: Message List - Single vs Multi Processor VM's</title>
    <link>http://communities.vmware.com/community/vmtn/general/performance?view=discussions</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:16:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Clearspace 1.10.12 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-26T17:16:09Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Single vs Multi Processor VM's</title>
      <link>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1003725?tstart=0#1003725</link>
      <description>You might check this thread out - a great discussion on cingle vs multiple vcpus - &lt;a class="jive-link-external" href="http://communities.vmware.com/thread/157849?tstart=0"&gt;http://communities.vmware.com/thread/157849?tstart=0&lt;/a&gt; and I agree woth oreeh start with one vcpu - you can always adde extras if needed -</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:14:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>weinstein5</author>
      <guid>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1003725?tstart=0#1003725</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-07-26T17:14:52Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 year, 4 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Single vs Multi Processor VM's</title>
      <link>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1003667?tstart=0#1003667</link>
      <description>This depends on the actual application used.&lt;br /&gt;
With "SMP aware" applications like MSSQL, Oracle I'd use vSMP if necessary.&lt;br /&gt;
Multithread applications however can be run on single vCPU VMs as well and usually perform well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My opinion: always start with a single vCPU VM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see a reason why a DC would ever need vSMP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Message was edited by: oreeh</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:35:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>oreeh</author>
      <guid>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1003667?tstart=0#1003667</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-07-26T15:35:04Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 year, 4 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Single vs Multi Processor VM's</title>
      <link>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1003666?tstart=0#1003666</link>
      <description>&lt;br /&gt;
I will check those links out.. but do you have a quick summary you could give me?  Do you see better performance out of multi proc VM's if they can utilize multi threads in the VM?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p /&gt;
&lt;p /&gt;
&lt;p /&gt;
-Glenn</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:31:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>gjeff80</author>
      <guid>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1003666?tstart=0#1003666</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-07-26T15:31:20Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 year, 4 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>1</clearspace:replyCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Single vs Multi Processor VM's</title>
      <link>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1003664?tstart=0#1003664</link>
      <description>See &lt;a class="jive-link-wiki" href="http://communities.vmware.com/docs/DOC-5501"&gt;VMkernel Scheduler&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class="jive-link-wiki" href="http://communities.vmware.com/docs/DOC-4960"&gt;Co-scheduling SMP VMs in VMware ESX Server&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a class="jive-link-wiki" href="http://communities.vmware.com/docs/DOC-5420"&gt;CPU Performance Analysis and Monitoring&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:26:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>oreeh</author>
      <guid>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1003664?tstart=0#1003664</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-07-26T15:26:28Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 year, 4 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>2</clearspace:replyCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Single vs Multi Processor VM's</title>
      <link>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1003663?tstart=0#1003663</link>
      <description>&lt;br /&gt;
Hi,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p /&gt;
I'm looking for someone to clarify an outstanding question we've had here at my company.  The debate is if you get better performance out of a virtual machine with 1 or multiple virtual processors.  It's my understanding that when you give a VM a virtual processor it only gets 1 core of a physical processor in the ESX to use.  So one would only assume if you give the VM multiple processors you would make more processing power available to the VM.  I know back in the esx 2.5 days they said multi processor VM's could perform slower than single processor vm's.  Is that still the case?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p /&gt;
We are deploying some domain controllers on virtual machines and I would expect that we would see better performance out of multi processor virtual machines to host the DC's but I've heard that you see a decrease in VM performance when you give it multiple virtual processors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p /&gt;
Can anyone provide an answer on this and any backup documentation that might be useful that I can pass around to my co workers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p /&gt;
&lt;p /&gt;
&lt;p /&gt;
hanks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p /&gt;
Glenn</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:20:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>gjeff80</author>
      <guid>http://communities.vmware.com/message/1003663?tstart=0#1003663</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-07-26T15:20:01Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 year, 4 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>4</clearspace:replyCount>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

