<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:clearspace="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/clearspace/rss" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>VMware Communities: Message List - Does the number of VCPUS relate to the Virtual SMP support provided by VMWare</title>
    <link>http://communities.vmware.com/community/vmtn/general/performance?view=discussions</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 18:50:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>Clearspace 1.10.12 (http://jivesoftware.com/products/clearspace/)</generator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-23T18:50:56Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does the number of VCPUS relate to the Virtual SMP support provided by VMWare</title>
      <link>http://communities.vmware.com/message/953074?tstart=0#953074</link>
      <description>Also note that we recently published &lt;a class="jive-link-wiki" href="http://communities.vmware.com/docs/DOC-4960"&gt;Co-scheduling SMP VMs in VMware ESX Server&lt;/a&gt;  detailing the relaxation of the co-scheduling requirement you mentioned.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 18:50:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>drummonds</author>
      <guid>http://communities.vmware.com/message/953074?tstart=0#953074</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-05-23T18:50:56Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 year, 6 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does the number of VCPUS relate to the Virtual SMP support provided by VMWare</title>
      <link>http://communities.vmware.com/message/951702?tstart=0#951702</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="jive-quote"&gt;for ex,if suppose i have a server with dual core processor,then can i have four way VSMP support on the server.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With only one dual-core CPU in the ESX hosts you can only use two way vSMP. But that wouldn't work well for the reasons Dave already mentioned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="jive-quote"&gt;in that case what is the number of VCPUS?&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of vCPUs itself is related to the number of physical cores in the following way (from the &lt;a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vi3_35/esx_3/r35/vi3_35_25_config_max.pdf"&gt;Configuration maximums pdf&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
Number of virtual CPUs per server: 128&lt;br /&gt;
Number of virtual CPUs per core: 8 (11 with VDI)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore with two cores in the host you have a maximum of 16 vCPUs.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:22:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>oreeh</author>
      <guid>http://communities.vmware.com/message/951702?tstart=0#951702</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-05-22T16:22:23Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 year, 6 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does the number of VCPUS relate to the Virtual SMP support provided by VMWare</title>
      <link>http://communities.vmware.com/message/951243?tstart=0#951243</link>
      <description>With vSMP you can run a VM with 1, 2 or 4 virtual CPUs (vCPU).  When ESX schedules a CPU cycle for a VM, it has to find the same number of free physical CPU cores as there are vCPUs the VM.  So for a 2 vCPU VM,  ESX would have to find two free CPU cores and for a 4 vCPU VM ESX would find 4 free physical CPU cores.  So to answer your one questions,  you would require a server with at least 4 physical CPU cores to run a 4 vCPU VM.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So for vSMP each vCPU will execute on a seperate physical CPU core and those CPU cores must be free at the same time for the VM to get a CPU cycle.  Here's a good paper to read through on the topic - &lt;a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vsmp_best_practices.pdf"&gt;http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vsmp_best_practices.pdf&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 07:37:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Dave.Mishchenko</author>
      <guid>http://communities.vmware.com/message/951243?tstart=0#951243</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-05-22T07:37:47Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 year, 6 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>1</clearspace:replyCount>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Does the number of VCPUS relate to the Virtual SMP support provided by VMWare</title>
      <link>http://communities.vmware.com/message/951242?tstart=0#951242</link>
      <description>&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the response.still am not clear with the VCPU concept.i saw in a document that  VMware provides four way Virtual SMP support.how does that put a constraint on the VCPUS.how it relates to the number of physical processor available on the server.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p /&gt;
 for ex,if suppose i have a server with dual core processor,then can i have four way VSMP support on the server.in that case what is the number of VCPUS? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p /&gt;
And can someone explain what is the logic behind the concept of VSMP and VCPU. Thanks in Advance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 07:29:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>srimini</author>
      <guid>http://communities.vmware.com/message/951242?tstart=0#951242</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-05-22T07:29:14Z</dc:date>
      <clearspace:dateToText>1 year, 6 months ago</clearspace:dateToText>
      <clearspace:replyCount>3</clearspace:replyCount>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

