Virtual Desktop Blog

Citix admits PCoIP is better than ICA on the LAN?

wponder — Tue, 05 May 2009 22:58:08 GMT

This year I was not able to attend Synergy, but I have been getting real time reports from friends and associates who are there. So, there will not be any notifications of failed demo's from me. I have been getting reports second hand from the show that Mark Templton has made some surprising comments and positioning on stage during the keynote.

Note!!!!! This is all second hand, call it FUD, bull or whatever you want. I was not there and did not hear it first hand.

First there was a demonstration of some of the existing and future capabilities of HDX. Things like Multimedia redirection that we have been shipping with View for some time now for RDP. During this part of the keynote there was a comparison to an unnamed protocol. I can only venture to guess that would be RDP and the comparison showed ICA performing better. Surprisingly there are reports that it was stated that the other protocol was equal to ICA on the LAN. Again, this is why I am assuming why the comparison was to RDP.

Afterwards, it was reported that was followed by a statement that PCoIP is better on the LAN than ICA. Of course, we would also agree with that.

If the reports are true which I hope they are, that only leaves the WAN and some outlying feature functionality. There is no question that the ICA team has been plugging away at WAN challenges for a long time. Some of that changes with PortICA as they work to unify the core protocol features between ICA and PortICA. That said, the bar is set.

Brian Madden's live blogging was one of the sources I saw the reports from. You can also follow along here....

Check out the 11:27 and 11:30 time stamp - http://www.brianmadden.com/blogs/brianmadden/archive/2009/05/05/live-blogging-the-citrix-synergy-keynote.aspx

The biggest question many have is what VMware and Teradici are doing? I have not been doing the best job sharing information here as the 1:1 interaction has been a bit overwhelming.

One of my goals is to improve that. However, I was able to give both Brian Madden and Chris Wolf sneak peaks a few months back.

http://www.chriswolf.com/?p=239

http://www.brianmadden.com/blogs/tv/archive/2009/02/26/brian-madden-tv-episode-3-vmworld-europe-2009-news-amp-wrap-up.aspx

For anyone that did not have the chance to see my VMwold presentation at VMworld EMEA. The goal is clear. Provide a dispaly protocol fit for users from the Task worker to the Designer. That includes both the LAN and the WAN. We do not want to just provide the best user experiance on the LAN but we also want to provide the best experiance on the WAN as well. Through our partnership and co-development with Teradici and based on the inital feedback we feel we are on the right track. In the end, cusotmers will have a broad array of solutions to choose from both physical and virtual including both tera enabled portals and soft clients all supported and managed with VMware View Manager.

Understand, anyone that has not seen what we have is skeptical and it is our responsibility to prove otherwise. Stay tuned for that, as we have more to come, and more to share and are working hard to bring it to you sooner rather than later.

The Secret is out - PCoIP Software Implementation

wponder — Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:02:01 GMT

VMworld Europe 2009 is a wrap and despite the economic challenges everyone is facing across the world the turnout was amazing. One of the most exciting parts of the show for me was being able to demonstrate an early preview of the software to software implementation of PCoIP that we have been working on through our co-development agreement with Teradici.

This really is no secret, we announced our strategic partnership with Teradici last September at VMworld 2008 in Las Vegas Nevada. Since, we have been working hard to bring the best remote display solution to market based on Teradici's next generation display protocol PCoIP. A combined VMware, Teradidici solution leveraging VMware View Manager will allows us to deliver an enhanced solution to desktop organizations that enables them to target users from task worker to the designer, remotely accessing their virtual desktop both from the LAN or the WAN using a single display protocol with an uncompromising user experiance. Combined with VMware View Managers support for multiple protocols, we can offer cusomters a solution with the broadest array of choice in display protocols and client access devices.

For everyone that was not able to attend VMworld 2009. On day two, Steve Herrod and Jerry Chen provided an update on our progress to dated wrapping up with a live demo of a Teradici hardware to hardware based solution. The full Keynote and demo can be seen here VMworld 2009 Day 2 Keynote

In addition to the Keynote, there was quite a bit of coverage from the blogging and analyst community around our PCoIP efforts. Below I have pulled together several bits of commentary I have been able to find.

Totally unplanned and pulled together on the fly, I was able to sit down with Brian Madden and give him the first sneak peak of a PCoIP software to software demo. This can be found on Brian Madden TV along with interviews from Microsoft, Redhat and Citrix.

I also was able to find an interview with Peter Ghostine, CTO of Quest Software. Interestingly, in this interview with Eric Sloof, Peter tries to explain what the VMware remote display strategy is? He shares his skepticism regarding what can be acheived with PCoIP. Peter primarily focuses on attempting to cast a shroud of doubt regarding the WAN capabilities of PCoIP. Quest has been betting on RDP and has been building RDP enhancements for some time now. Features such as MMR, similar to the technology we OEMed from WYSE. In addition, to psudo multimonitor and more needed features such as latency reduction etc..

On that note, I was also able to sit down with Chris Wolf. Chris Wolf is a Sr. Analyst with the Burton Group covering the virtualization space, focusing on the Desktop to the Datacenter. I had a little more time with Chris and was able to demonstrate the current progress we have made with software to software PCoIP under a variety of network conditions including both the LAN and the WAN. Chris shares his thoughts and observations here - VMware's Software PCoIP - A Sighting!

Last but not least, Gerben Kloosterman attended a presentation I gave on the future of the VMware View Remote Display Experiance. Gerben did an excellent job capturing the Q&A at the end sharing that information on his blog for anyone not able to attend. For more information visit Gerben's Blog on Virtualization.

VMware VDI - Thin Client Certification Program

wponder — Mon, 19 May 2008 13:47:00 GMT

Today we have several exciting announcements surrounding VMware VDI. The first announcement sets the stage to broaden the VMware VDI ecosystem as we launch a thin client certification program for thin client manufactures wanting to integrate with VMware technologies. Though this program we will be abel to work more closely with thin client manufactures and integrate feature functionality at the client device level that offers an even more complete and integrated solution for customers looking to deploy VMware VDI.

This program has been in the works for some time with a primary goal to increase the value for our joint customers while at the same time simplifying the integration of a wide array of thin clients so customers have a more broad choice when making a client decision for their VMware VDI deployments. The thin client space is very broad offering a wide array of device types such as CE, XPe, Linux, ThinOS, Ultra Thin and Zero Client based devices. This program will allow thin client vendors from across the spectrum to offer a tightly integrated, tested and certified solution.

Chip PC, Computer Lab International (CLI), Devon IT, Fujitsu Siemens Computers, HP, IGEL, NEC, Pano Logic, Praim by CompuMaster, Sun Microsystems, and Wyse are among the thin client vendors who will be certifying their clients as part of the new program.

One of the key components of the program allows us to accommodate the growing trend and move towards zero or ultra thin based clients. Typically these clients that have and an extremely small firmware or embedded OS and software or additional client connectivity is not installed locally. By taking an open approach and working closely with vendors in this space, customers will be able to choose clients devices that offer unique features that are only supported with a VMware VDI solution today and not integrated or tested with other VDI based solutions.

For more information see the following press release

What will Citrix do?

wponder — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:49:00 GMT

I wanted to wait till the smoke cleared before sharing some thoughts regarding Microsoft opening the specifications on several of its APIs and communication protocols. Part of the released technology was the specification of RDP.

For VMware VDI, this is probably the most interesting of the released protocol specifications. The initial impact to customers may not be that obvious. However, over time, the benefits could be huge. RDP is the preferred protocol for accessing VMware VDI based desktops. Currently, this makes the most sense to leverage as there is no added cost in doing so which is typically the case with third party add on protocols.

Although getting the optimal performance in broad set of network conditions can be tricky, but it's quite adequate in the highest majority of desktop replacement use cases. RDP has always had virtual channels which allow a third party to add feature functionality to RDP. For example, with VDM 2 we developed a generic USB device redirector that allows you to connect most USB devices, not supported by RDP to a client access device and make them available for use with your VMware VDI virtual desktop.

In order for third parties to leverage virtual channels, you either needed a team of lawyers and a chunk of change or some really good engineers that could reverse engineer. For some time now there have been licensees of the RDP spec and others who reverse engineered it in effort to add value. This included people building feature add-ons as well as full RDP client implementations. Open Source efforts such as RDesktop and commercial efforts from companies such as WYSE, VMware, ThinAnywhere, Provision Networks, Sun Microsystems, Calista and others have all contributed to enhancing RDP.

Over three years ago I started researching the use of VMware virtualization as a way to better manage and deliver desktop computing and overcome traditional server based computing short falls. As we started meeting with customers and sharing the vision of VDI it was becoming clear Citrix had lost their seat at the table. Customers were concerned with the issues surrounding Citrix as a solution, such as complexity, application compatibility and loss of a personal computing experience.

VMware VDI was resonating with IT organizations and desktop management teams as an answer for more broad desktop deployments. I was a little surprised, as no one can take away Citrix's past contributions to server based computing. It's always been my opinion Citrix and Microsoft had become comfortable with their position and the direction they were leading customers and the market.

As VMware VDI emerged it was becoming clear this was what customers wanted. I had not seen such vast interest and adoption of a desktop solution in a long time. Despite Microsoft attempting to down play interest, VECD emerged. As Citrix lost ground trying to protect the Presentation Server stronghold, they finally broke down, did a 360 degree about face, and sank 500M on XenSource.

Since they have renamed their legacy products and are attempting to broaden their vision beyond just "Application Delivery". Here at VMware we are building things from the ground up with virtualization in mind, not trying to retro fit legacy solutions to fit in a virtual world. Since the emergence of VMware VDI, millions of dollars are going into the R&D of network delivered desktops and applications. The result is innovation that improves user experience, desktop management and choice for IT organizations.

What does this mean for Citrix? For years there have been the conspiracy theories that Microsoft will buy Citrix. Over the years I have seen less and less evidence or reason to believe this, but I guess it could happen. For some time now, I have said Citrix is getting squeezed from the top by VMware and squeezed from the bottom by Microsoft. The crown jewel for Citrix is ICA. Without that, there is not a lot there you can't get from other cheaper more simple alternatives.

With the acquisition of Calista by Microsoft, it's clear they intended to continue the enhancement of RDP. With the RDP spec now open, more and more engineers can come to the party and rapidly further enhance RDP improving its performance and features in a broad array of use cases. With the XenSource acquisition, Citrix has dipped a toe in the open source world. Now that Micosoft has openly published the RDP specification, will Citrix set ICA free? Do they have any other choice? What long term value does ICA have with so many big companies now able to enhance RDP and in fact, already doing so?